Thursday, November 29, 2007

Tariki and Jiriki

In discussions of Japanese Buddhism you occassionally run across the notion of "tariki" and "jiriki." The Japanese character "ta," which is straight from Chinese actually, means "other, outiside." "Riki" means "power." "Ji," or "si" in modern Chinese, means "self." The notions tariki and jiriki have been part of Japanese Buddhist discourse since Buddhism arrived in Japan from China since the sixth century. Pure Land Buddhism, for example, is often compared to Lutheranism because of its emphasis on grace and the idea that the individual cannot save themselves and must rely upon the Buddha Amitaba to do so. Pure Land Buddhism was and is often distinguished from Zen where the emphasis was placed on individual initiative and the need for working out one's own salvation---a jiriki religion in other words.

Many of us who come to work in Saudi Arabia often see a similar distintion at work between "us" (as if we are all the same) and the Saudis. Saudis, for example, constantly utter the phrase "in sha Allah" meaning "God willing." This phrase is heard especially coming from those who might or might not do what you are asking of them. It is thus heard from bureaucrats when you want them to fix something in your government issued apartment, people in the personnel department where you work when you are waiting for them to process your immigration pepers, and from students when ask them to do some form of homework.

So are Saudis really less used to doing things for themselves than are people in the west? Judging from the Saudi students to whom I teach English and from other Saudis I encounter at my job and in the community, the answer seems to be yes. These students drive like complete maniacs on the highway and in residential areas. One of the leading causes of death in Saud Arabia is car accidents. I have not yet been here six months and have heard of three deaths among the friends or family members of my studednts. And this is only in my classes. There are other teachers I know who can vouch for similar numbers. So the reigning mindset on Saudi highways certainly seems to be a tariki one rather than a jiriki one.

The students I teach also seem to have a similar view when studying for exams or when doing homework. These students are in an institution where the entire second year is taught in English and where students will take courses in business and science and have to listen to lectures in English taught by speactialists in these disciplines. Some of the first year courses too are mathematics and computer science which are also taught completely in English. At least 60% of the students I teach (who are in the first year, or "prep year" of the program) are at a level of English that prevents them from carrying on a simple conversation in the language; yet they will not do the homework that I give them to help them improve in their handling of basic grammar structures and to acquire the needed vocabulary to communicate on basic topics in English.

So, the "tariki' mentality seems to be widespread here. But does it come from Islam (the word itself means "submission") , which stresses submission, obedience and the denial of the self and putting the family and uluma (the world of Islam) first? Or does it come from living under a welfare state run off of petro-dollars and where self-initiative is not needed? Here, much of the real work is done either by foreigners or by a small band of elite Saudis who actually posses the real skill and knowhow and run the country.

The answer, as usual, lies somewhere in between. The real contradiction however, and the saddest and most confusing thing, is that the few Saudis who do seem to realize that their instututions are set up to engender passivity are the ones who become the new elite. This elite, as far as I can tell, is the only patrioitc group of individuals here. The rest of them, however proud they are of at least thingking of themselves as Saudi, do not seem to realize how they constantly undercut the building and improving of their nation. It is for this reason that I feel like I, who have not even been here six months, am often a better Saudi than those self-understood real Saudis that I encounter everyday living out their bewildering, unconcered and "tariki" lives.

5 comments:

Edward Ott said...

After dealing with Saudis for a while, who start their cars with a very loud declaration of the Basmallah, that Saudis generally Follow a strange version of Islam where one of the ways to reach Paradise is to die in a high speed Auto accident.

Anonymous said...

Note that "other-power" in Japan came out of a feeling of hopelessness. It became popular at a time when Japan seemed to be in a state of chaos, when fires and wars were the norm. However, the other-power in Saudi, according to you, is due to oil-dollars. This reminds me of when the Dalai Lama said that it is better to be born neither too rich nor too poor. In other words, the rich don't need to practice and the poor don't have the time. One needs to see both the problem and the goal, and then one needs the will and the conditions to get from one side of the shore to the other.

Malcolm XYZ said...

also note that the Lutheran "corrupted will" (sola fide, sola scriptura) comes at at time of supposed "rebirth" in Europe, a time of new discoveries, new science and all of that. So I think this is a universal category regardless of the time and place. I am basically probing and confirming something said by many who come here from the west. Many of them would say it has to do with the spirit of capitalism and individualism that is part of the west and not found in Saudi. I agree to a certain extent, but think there is more to be said.

Anonymous said...

As someone interested in Sufism, you may want to go back to the founder of Islam and compare him with the founder of Japanese Pureland. Both of them did solo retreats. Honen's retreats were certainly long and detailed, following the prescribed practises of Chinese Pureland. So it seems quite ironic that he should "come down from the mountain" spreading the word of other-power. Perhaps Mohd's story is a little different - I don't know - but it would be an interesting way into the Sufi idea that Mohd was a mystic.

Malcolm XYZ said...

i wonder what the consequences are of thinking of Mhd as a mystic. I can think of some. It individualizes the entire revelation, for starters.

Another interesting quesion is about prophets and mystics. Are prophets not already mystics?